Project 2 : Youtube video

Project 2 : Youtube video

ARC605 | Spring 2008

Websites such as YouTube allow us to view (through the limitations of the two-dimensional monitor), a spatial experience of a building on another continent. On closer inspection, one often finds that the constructed spaces are not exactly as depicted in the video. One might interpolate from this a new way to represent a project. The production of a video which splices images together of partial construction could provide the viewer with a spatial experience of a proposed space.

For Project 2, students were required to produce a video which would attempt to re-present the unique spatial conditions which they had developed in the construction from Project 1. These videos were to explore the re-presentation how the construction they had developed in Project 1 might be interpolated into fullscale building spatial arrangement. In other words, the videos were to present a spatial experience based on a future construction which had no pre-described planar or sectional ordering. The pedagogical intent of this exercise was to free the students from preconceived ideas of how a building might be organized. It was believed that this would encourage each student to develop work unencumbered by preconceptions of form, structure, enclosure, etc.

Project 1 : Constructing vision

View from a tinted window

Project 1 : Constructing vision

ARC605 | Spring 2008

For the first project, students were asked to explore a specific ‘constructed intervention in space’ and the potential for this construction to mediate our perception of space. As background preparation for this project, students were presented a series of lectures on 20th century art, specifically those which attempted to undermine our perception of light and space. It was pointed out that these art works were not to be seen as ‘precedents’ in the architectural sense of the word. Since these art works rarely, if ever, had a specific use or function. And most of these works, whether installations or independently constructed spaces, operated through variations of disorientation, these works could be said to be against or counter to use.

The final site for the installation of this construction was the graduate studio space. The final solution was not to be a scale model, but a full scale construction which allowed a viewer to actually experience a particular spatial condition. The final construction would be judged by how successfully it presented a specific spatial perception for the viewer/participant @ 1:1 scale.

Ocular architecture

Ocular architecture

ARC605 | Spring 2008
Professor Kenneth MacKay

This studio investigated specific aspects of visual spatial perception and the extent to which this investigation could be used to generate unique spatial conditions in buildings. The studio consisted of three components:

RESEARCH – initial research into a specific condition which has been historically labeled a ‘disability.’

FABRICATION – Using the Materials and Methods Shop, students fabricated a one-to-one construction which was intended to create a spatial condition which was both enabling/disabling for the viewer.

BUILDING DESIGN – Students incorporated the results into the design of a new building focused on creating environments in which the ‘disabled’ participant is privileged in their engagement with the environment over the ‘able-bodied’ participant.

Transforming tradition

Student rendering - Bird's-eye view of 4 wooden houses

Transforming tradition

Bird's-eye view of a suburban neighborhood community

Transforming tradition

ARC605 | Fall 2007
Professor Edward Steinfeld

New urbanism is rapidly gaining popularity among consumers, developers, and government. This oppositional movement seeks to develop more livable, balanced, and sustainable communities in contrast to continued suburban sprawl in the suburbs and the abandonment of urbanist design traditions in central cities. The stated goals of the NU movement are very compatible with the goals of inclusive design. However, there are also many critics of new urbanist practices who maintain that new urbanism too often results in neighborhoods and communities that exclude social groups based on race, income, disability, and age. The instructor is, in fact, one of the most visible critics with regard to age and disability.